Compare and contrast

Luke Vnenchak gives us an update on Scoop, the in-house CMS in place at the New York Times. It's really interesting to see how (or even whether) a CMS solves certain problems. Among them:

• Scoop provides for multiple versions of draft/published stories: this blows the doors off CQ5's simple (but effective) author instance/publish instance model.
• Automatic smart cropping of images, given a master and a thumbnail. I've had clients that would love a feature like that.
• Locking body copy independently of assets like images and multimedia. Yep, that's also something that my guys demand.
• Tagging to an open standard: I haven't built any production code to support this, but it's something we have explored. Generally the stumbling block is the question of who owns the tags.